Somalia has talented builders and ambitious ideas. So why do so few Somali-built products reach global markets? The answer is more complicated than a lack of technical skill.
Eng Abdalla
Updated Aug 31, 2026
No comments yet — be the first to weigh in.
There is a question I have been thinking about for a long time:
Why haven't we seen a Somali-built software product become widely used across the world?
Not just an app built by a Somali developer for Somali users.
I mean a product that starts in Somalia, solves a problem beyond Somalia, and eventually becomes something people in different countries use every day.
I don't think the answer is simply that we lack talent.
There are Somali developers who can build serious web applications, mobile applications, APIs, SaaS products, and increasingly, AI systems.
So if the talent exists, what is holding us back?
I think the answer is a combination of how we think about products, how we protect and validate ideas, access to capital and global infrastructure, and the environment in which builders operate.
If you look at many software projects being built locally, you will find familiar patterns:
These products are not useless.
Quite the opposite.
They solve real problems, and building them teaches developers valuable engineering skills.
But there is a difference between building software and building a product that can travel.
A system designed specifically around one institution's workflow may be a successful local product.
A global product starts with a different question:
Is this problem specific to Somalia, or does Somalia happen to be one place where this problem exists?
That distinction changes everything.
One of the biggest shifts a Somali builder can make is changing the definition of their market.
Instead of asking:
"What software does a Somali business need?"
ask:
"What problem exists here that millions of other people might also have?"
That doesn't mean ignoring Somalia.
It means using Somalia as a place to discover problems that may have a much larger market.
A difficult environment can actually be a powerful source of product ideas.
Connectivity problems can teach you how to build resilient systems.
Payment limitations can expose problems in financial infrastructure.
Fragmented services can reveal opportunities for better platforms.
Local problems can become global products when the underlying problem is universal.
There is a real psychological barrier that affects builders:
fear of sharing the idea.
Someone may spend months thinking about a product.
They design it.
They research the market.
They write the code.
They build a prototype.
Then, when the time comes to show it to someone, another thought appears:
"What if they steal it?"
That fear is understandable.
But it can become dangerous when it stops a builder from validating anything.
A product that nobody knows about is also a product that nobody can validate.
This is one of the hardest lessons in building products.
An idea alone is rarely a strong competitive advantage.
The moat is usually somewhere else:
If someone hears your idea and can reproduce the entire business immediately, the idea probably wasn't the strongest part of the business.
What they cannot easily reproduce is everything you build around it.
That doesn't mean founders should carelessly expose everything.
Sensitive technical details, credentials, private datasets, unreleased source code, financial information, and confidential business information should obviously be protected.
But there is a difference between protecting sensitive information and hiding the entire product from the world.
You don't need to reveal everything to everyone.
When talking to potential users, you can focus on:
You don't necessarily need to reveal:
When talking to investors or partners, use appropriate confidentiality agreements where genuinely necessary.
And most importantly:
validate before you build too much.
Talk to potential users.
Build a small prototype.
Put it in front of people.
Watch how they use it.
Ask what they would actually pay for.
That is much more valuable than spending a year protecting an idea that nobody wants.
Copying is a real business risk.
It happens everywhere.
A larger company can sometimes move faster because it already has:
That can make competition particularly difficult for a young startup.
But the answer isn't to avoid the market.
The answer is to build things that are difficult to copy quickly.
If your only advantage is:
"I had the idea first."
you are vulnerable.
If your advantage is:
"I understand these users better, I ship faster, my product is better, and I have built trust with the market."
you have something much stronger.
This becomes especially important in Somalia.
A new product is not competing only against another piece of software.
It may be competing against an established company that people already know.
Imagine two products offer almost the same service.
One comes from a company people have trusted for years.
The other comes from a startup nobody has heard of.
Even if the startup has the better technology, customers may still choose the established company.
That is not irrational.
Trust reduces perceived risk.
For a new startup, trust has to be built deliberately through:
This is why building in public can be valuable.
Not everything has to remain hidden.
Funding is another obvious challenge.
Building a serious product takes time.
Eventually you may need:
Access to capital can make these things dramatically easier.
But capital is not the starting point for every product.
A better sequence for many early builders is:
Problem
↓
Users
↓
Prototype
↓
Validation
↓
First customers
↓
Revenue
↓
ScaleFunding becomes much more useful when you already have evidence that something works.
The goal shouldn't be:
"How do I raise money for my idea?"
It should increasingly become:
"How do I prove that this problem is worth solving?"
There is another issue that doesn't get discussed enough.
A developer can build a globally useful product and still face infrastructure limitations.
Payments can be difficult.
International incorporation can be difficult.
Access to certain financial services can be limited.
Cloud infrastructure may be more expensive or complicated to operate.
International customer acquisition is unfamiliar territory.
These aren't purely technical problems.
They sit at the intersection of:
technology + finance + regulation + business + infrastructure.
This is one reason building a global startup from Somalia can require more effort than simply writing the software.
I don't think the answer is one giant government program or one huge investment.
Some of the most useful changes are surprisingly simple.
Don't start with:
"I want to build an AI app."
Start with:
"There is a problem that people repeatedly experience. Can technology solve it better?"
Technology should serve the problem.
Not the other way around.
You don't need millions of users on day one.
Find the first 10.
Then the first 100.
Then the first 1,000.
A product becomes global one user at a time.
Being in Somalia shouldn't automatically mean building only for Somalia.
If you discover a problem locally, ask whether the underlying problem exists elsewhere.
If it does, design the architecture so expansion is possible.
A great product nobody discovers is still invisible.
Learn:
Distribution is part of engineering a company.
Share:
You don't need to reveal proprietary information.
But being visible creates something valuable:
a reputation.
And reputation compounds.
One person does not need to build everything.
Somalia has developers, designers, marketers, researchers, founders, students, and business people.
We need more teams where those skills come together.
A technically strong developer paired with someone who understands customers and distribution can go much further than either person working alone.
Sometimes we celebrate a project simply because it exists.
But shipping is only the beginning.
A stronger set of questions is:
These questions move us from project building toward product building.
I think we have already proven that.
The next challenge is proving that Somali builders can create products that compete in markets much larger than our own.
That requires more than technical ability.
It requires:
product thinking, research, design, distribution, capital, infrastructure, resilience, and the courage to enter markets where nobody knows your name.
And yes, there will be failures.
Some ideas will be copied.
Some products will fail.
Some startups will run out of money.
Some experiments will go nowhere.
That's part of building.
The answer cannot be to stop trying.
I don't think Somalia is missing ideas.
I think we are still building the ecosystem that allows those ideas to travel.
The developer who builds a school system today might build an education platform tomorrow.
The person solving a local payment problem might eventually build financial infrastructure.
The engineer experimenting with Somali AI might eventually contribute to global AI research.
The important shift is not abandoning local problems.
It is learning to see global opportunities inside local problems.
We should build things that work here.
Then ask:
Could this work somewhere else?
If the answer is yes, that's where the journey gets interesting.
Maybe the first globally recognized Somali software product hasn't been built yet.
That's not a reason for pessimism.
It's an invitation.
There is still room for someone to build it.